Top Court Sides with Free Speech in Abortion-Protest Case
By Pete Winn,
Associate editor,
Focus on the Family, CitizenLink
SUMMARY: Justices say racketeering laws do not apply.
The Supreme Court said today that peaceful pro-life
protest is not racketeering -- and federal laws designed
to crack down on organized crime may not be used to
silence those who demonstrate at abortion clinics.
Ruling in the case of Scheidler v. NOW for a third time,
justices ruled 8-0 that Congress never intended for the
Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act to
be used against pro-lifers who stand in front of abortion
clinics. Justice Samuel Alito did not take part in the
case.
RICO triples the amount of damages and allows for heavier
fines and penalties against racketeers and drug kingpins.
It's designed to break up crime organizations.
Writing for the Court, Justice Stephen Breyer said
Congress did not intend to create "a freestanding
physical-violence offense" when it created RICO or the
underlying law it is tied to, the federal anti-extortion
law known as the Hobbs Act.
Breyer also said Congress chose to address violence
outside abortion clinics in 1994 by passing the Freedom of
Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE) Act.
Joe Scheidler, the namesake of Scheidler v. NOW, who has
defended himself from the pro-abortion group for two
decades, is relieved.
"It's over," he told CitizenLink. "Now we get our house
back, and the injunction will be removed."
The national director of the Pro-Life Action League of
Chicago, Scheidler said he is pleased with what he hopes
is the final ruling of the court on the issue.
"We've been there three times already, which is a record,"
he said. "This one was unanimous, and it sounds very final
-- like they don't want to mess around any more. I think
they were insulted by the appellate court holding up their
decision and saying (the Supreme Court was) wrong. We were
there for the hearings, and the justices sounded pretty
miffed at the idea that they didn't know their business."
Bruce Hausknecht, judicial analyst for Focus on the Family
Action, said the original suit was filed in 1986, when the
National Organization for Women joined forces with
abortion-clinic owners to file suit against Scheidler --
later adding several members of Operation Rescue.
More than 75 groups, including the AFL-CIO, filed
friend-of-the-court briefs on behalf of Scheidler's case
-- and free speech.
"The abortionists and feminists wanted a nationwide
injunction against those abortion protesters to prevent
them from protesting at any abortion clinic in the
nation," Hausknecht said. "They lost."
To get there, the Supreme Court had to reverse the 7th
Circuit Court of Appeals three times.
Jay Sekulow, chief counsel of the American Center for Law
and Justice, called the decision "a major victory for the
pro-life community."
As attorney for Operation Rescue members in the case,
Sekulow said it "removes a cloud that has been hanging
over pro-life demonstrators for years."
Mat Staver, president of the Liberty Counsel, said the
case is unlikely to come back to the high court.
"The way this decision was written -- it was unanimous --
it's clear the Supreme Court does not ever want to see
this case again," he said. "In fact, they probably thought
in 2003, when they made the previous ruling, that they
would never see it again."
Staver said abortion clinics and providers wrongly used
RICO for almost two decades.
"RICO can no longer hang like a sword of Damocles over the
heads of pro-lifers," he said. "This is another event that
will fuel the engine of the pro-life movement to stand up
for life. It's this kind of threat which has in the past
resulted in the silencing of the pro-life Americans."
Scheidler, notably, is not one who was ever silenced,
despite horrible fines and legal costs. He has continued
to pray and do sidewalk counseling at clinics while the
case dragged on -- and said he hopes today's decision will
bring more people out to the abortion clinics.
"What I really want to see come to an end," he said, "is
this fear that they may be saddled with triple damages or
spend time in jail if they simply go to an abortion clinic
to pray and exercise their First Amendment right."
He said sidewalk counseling continues to be very
effective.
"We've stopped thousands and thousands of abortions over
the years," he said. "Every time we're there, we talk to
some woman about using her common sense instead of acting
in fear and distress -- and we give her help. That's what
this is all about -- it's not about violence or anything
else. It's about saving lives."